Baldrige Glossary: Comment Writing Guidelines

(Blue words below link to definitions, detailed descriptions, examples, core values, Baldrige Best Practices, Baldrige Application Response Templates, or examples)

Comment Guidelines [Comment Writing Guidelines]

Comment Content Guidelines

DO

o     Address central requirements of the Criteria

o     Use a single, complete thought to specify the strength (using specific examples from the application) or OFI (using specific omissions or concerns identified from the application) clearly.

o     Write process comments so they contain a subject identified from the Criteria, the application, or the Scoring Guidelines, verb(s) and requirements from the Criteria, examples from the application, and figure numbers, as appropriate.

o     Write results comments so they contain a subject identified from the results or Criteria requirement being addressed, from/to timeframes, from/to performance levels, linkages to Key Factors (KFs), "so whats", and figure numbers, as appropriate.

o     State observations in a factual manner, e.g., "Customer satisfaction rates have increased from 75% in 2002 to 94% in 2004 and now exceed best-in-class levels."

o     Draw linkages across Items or between an Item and the applicant's Organizational Profile.

o     Place the comment on the correct Item Worksheet based on the Criteria, not on where the information appears in the application.

o     Ensure that the comment does not contradict other comments in the same or other Items or in the Key Themes Worksheet.

DO NOT

o     Go beyond the requirements of the Criteria or assert your personal opinions.

o     Be prescriptive by using "could," "should," and "would."

o     Be judgmental by using terms such as "good," "bad," or "inadequate."

o     Comment on the applicant's style of writing or data presentation.

Comment Style Guidelines

DO

o     Use a polite, professional, and positive tone

o     Use active voice and present tense (e.g., `completes' rather than `is completed').

o     Use vocabulary/phraseology from the Criteria and the Scoring Guidelines.

o     For Stage 1 and 2 scorebooks, tell what is missing if something "is not clear." For Stage 3, clarify all "not clear" statements.

o     Use such words as "the applicant" or "the organization" to refer to the applicant in the Stages 1 and 2 scorebooks.

o     Use the applicant's name in Stage 3 scorebooks.

o     Use the applicant's terminology when appropriate.

DO NOT

o     Use jargon or acronyms unless they are used by the applicant.

Item Worksheet Guidelines

DO

o       Include 4-6 Key Factors based on the Criteria requirements for the Item. These will differ depending on the Item.

o       Include the 6-10 comments per Item that are most relevant and important to the applicant based on its Key Factors.

o       Ensure that the Item's score is supported by the 6-10 comments.

Note: Blue words above are hyperlinks to other Glossary HD terms and their definitions.

EXCELLENCE RESOURCES

BALDRIGE  STORE

TRAINING

BEST PRACTICE PROCESSES

CRITERIA RESPONSE TEMPLATES

APPLICATION SUPPORT

BALDRIGE INTERNATIONAL

SEMINARS CONFERENCES

INTEGRATED EXCELLENCE SYSTEMS

EXCELLENCE TOOLS

INTEGRATED CRITERIA

CONSULTING

ASSESSMENT

COMPARISON METRICS

CASE STUDIES

SITE VISIT PREP

BALDRIGE INTEGRATOR

ABOUT US