BALDRIGE SCORING SYSTEM
Baldrige Scoring Guidelines for 2012 and other Scoring System Guides and Tools
The scoring of responses to Criteria Items (Items) and Award applicant feedback are based on two evaluation dimensions: (1) Process and (2) Results. Criteria users need to furnish information relating to these dimensions. Specific factors for these dimensions are described below. Links to all Scoring Guidelines versions are provided on this page.
|
Process Scoring |
Results Scoring |
|
- the methods used to accomplish the process - the appropriateness of the methods to the Item requirements and the organization’s
operating environment - the degree to which the approach is repeatable and based on reliable data and information (i.e., systematic)
- your approach is applied in addressing Item requirements relevant and important to
your organization
in your organization
- your approach is aligned with your organizational needs identified in the
Organizational Profile and other Process Items
processes and work
units across processes and work units to support organization-wide goals |
“Trends” refers to
(i.e., the slope of trend data)
organizations similar
to yours
- your results measures (often through segmentation) address important customer, product, market, process, and action plan performance requirements identified in
your Organizational Profile and in Process
Items organization-wide goals |
2012 Baldrige Scoring Guidelines

Previous Versions
| Business | Health Care | Education |
|
Process |
Results |
Process |
Results |
Process |
Results |
| 2009 - 2010 | 2009 - 2010 | 2009 - 2010 | 2009 - 2010 | 2009 - 2010 | 2009 - 2010 |
| 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 | 2008 |
| 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 |
| 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 |
| 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 |
The weather in Dubai is ideal this time of year. So please join me for one of the following three Senior Leadership seminars:
A half-day Leadership Seminar for business leaders and support staff (6 February)
A one-day Leadership Course for managers and practitioners (7 February), or
A 2-day Leadership Workshop for managers and practitioners (8-9 February 2012)
Learn more about the course agendas and benefits by clicking on this events announcement
Baldrige Results Scoring Guidelines Quiz
Q: Which American document has approximately 150 more words than the other? a) the Baldrige Results Scoring Guidelines or b) Abraham Lincoln's "Gettysburg Address"?
A: The Results Scoring Guidelines have 400 words. The Gettysburg Address has 256.
Q: Which of these three terms are not used to assess results? a) 'early good', b) 'on time good', or c) 'late good'
A: If you thought this was a trick question, unfortunately you're wrong. 'Early good' is used in the 0 to 5% scoring range. Silly me. I thought getting good results early would have scored higher.
Q: Results are quantitative by nature. However qualitative and/or judgmental guideline terms are used to assess them in all scoring bands. Is this: TRUE? or FALSE?
A: TRUE. The judgmental terms "poor", "good", "good relative", "very good", "good to excellent", "excellent", and my personal favorite "early good" are used to assess the quantitative results. For 2011, the terms "good for nothing", "good enough", and "too good to be true" will be added . . . not true. Also not true is that because some people do not understand what "early good" means, "on-time good", and "late good" will also be added.
Q: "World class" was once part of the Results Scoring Guidelines: TRUE? or FALSE?
A: TRUE. The early guidelines required winners to demonstrate 'world class' results to score in the highest scoring range.
Q: Which of the following terms are not used to assess the quantity of results? "no", "any", "few", "little", "little or no", "limited", "limited or no", "some", "some to many", "mainly", "many", "many to most", "majority", "most to fully", or "fully"
A: Believe it or not, "some to many" and "most to fully" are not in the scoring guidelines. "Mainly"???
Q: Not one Examiner knows how to interpret the relative meaning of these results assessment terms: "important", "high priority", and "key". TRUE? or FALSE?
A: I don't know how many but I do know that there is at least one who has never been able to figure it out (LOL).
2012 Baldrige Scoring Guidelines Improvement Opportunities
Using qualitative terms to assess quantitative data if fundamentally wrong and needs to be eradicated to improve assessment integrity and validity.
Use of terminology whose meaning cannot be meaningfully deciphered (e.g., mainly, early good, key) does not belong in Scoring Guidelines.
The 'Levels' scoring dimension appears to be redundant and is not and has never been needed.
It is not practical to expect Examiners to read and mentally process more than 400 words each time they score a Process or Results Item.
Baldrige Improvement Tools and Resources . . . from the most experienced source
(See more resources at: Baldrige Excellence Tools and Resources Home)
|
Essentials: |
||||||||||||
|
Tools: |
OrgProfiler | |||||||||||
|
Core Competencies: |
||||||||||||
|
Special Focus: |
|
|
2012 Baldrige ARTICULATED Criteria . . . now approved for use by more than 20 national quality awards
(ARTICULATED = Improved understanding + More efficient = More practical)
(Articulated Criteria versions have been downloaded thousands of times daily)
2012 Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence - basic versions
See the hundreds of Criteria requirements that have been deleted from the previous versions